On 9/30/2010 2:16 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > Hm. Actually, I think I like Jonas' proposal better than 1 or 2 (and Shawn, > I see your point about why 2 is better than 1). I also think that Shawn's > example of doing multiple schema upgrades should still work 3 since we fire > onsuccesses in the order that items were queued up. I agree. Three seems safer/better still! Cheers, Shawn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:40 GMT