Re: [CORS] HTTP error codes in preflight response

On 21.09.2010 11:58, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:53:39 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> How do you know now that 234 will not make sense in two years from now?
>
> Common sense. But apart from that it seems saner to just operate from a
> whitelist here. We only need one response code for the protocol to work
> -- 200 -- why make it unbounded?

To address use case we currently don't know of. Remember, "extensibility".

Best regards, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 10:05:26 UTC