- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:58:31 +0200
- To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "Webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:53:39 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > How do you know now that 234 will not make sense in two years from now? Common sense. But apart from that it seems saner to just operate from a whitelist here. We only need one response code for the protocol to work -- 200 -- why make it unbounded? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 09:59:19 UTC