I also support this publication. -Sam On Nov 10, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > I support this publication. > > - Maciej > > On Nov 10, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > >> Anne has now resolved the last issue for XHR (1) and as discussed >> during last week's f2f meeting [1], the spec is ready for a Last >> Call Working Draft publication: >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/ >> >> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's >> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note that as >> specified in the Process Document [2], a Working Group's Last Call >> announcement is a signal that: >> >> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant >> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements >> document) in the Working Draft; >> >> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant >> dependencies with other groups; >> >> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these >> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call >> announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to >> advance the technical report to later maturity levels. >> >> As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and >> encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline >> for comments is November 18. >> >> -Regards, Art Barstow >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call >> >> >> > >Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 02:13:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:22 GMT