Re: [XHR2] timeout

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy.
>>
>> Such as?
>
> Actually, apart from switching the state to 0 in the end there is nothing.
> (This does not happen for user aborts though so I still rather not copy
> that.)
>
> Anyway, do you have opinions on the synchronous case? Do you agree we should
> use TIMEOUT_ERR there? What do the people from Microsoft think?

That makes sense to me.

/ Jonas