W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: [XHR2] timeout

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:17:59 +0100
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.u26yf9qk64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>  
> wrote:
>> abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy.
> Such as?

Actually, apart from switching the state to 0 in the end there is nothing.  
(This does not happen for user aborts though so I still rather not copy  

Anyway, do you have opinions on the synchronous case? Do you agree we  
should use TIMEOUT_ERR there? What do the people from Microsoft think?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:18:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:20 UTC