- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:17:59 +0100
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy. > > Such as? Actually, apart from switching the state to 0 in the end there is nothing. (This does not happen for user aborts though so I still rather not copy that.) Anyway, do you have opinions on the synchronous case? Do you agree we should use TIMEOUT_ERR there? What do the people from Microsoft think? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:18:37 UTC