On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > There already is a "WebDatabase" API which is SQL based. That > sounds way to close to "WebDB" for my comfort. > > Maybe WebDatabase should be WebSQLDatabase or WebSQLDB I have suggested this before [1], but fighting about names seems to be a lost cause in this WG. > > And WebSimpleDB should be WebTreeDatabase or WebTreeDB? An ordinary developer would not notice anything tree-like in this spec and so it will not help anyone to call this TreeDB. > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Simon Raboczi <raboczi@gmail.com> > wrote: > Please don't call your web database API "simple". It's a > meaningless noise word unless there's some other non-simple web > database API to compare it to. It doesn't even serve to produce a > pronounceable acronym like SAX or SOAP. "WebDB API" would be fine. > > Nikunj http://o-micron.blogspot.com [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/D34DA34B-3ED7-4D65-9ECB-C9A7BFF3110F@oracle.comReceived on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 18:51:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT