W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Please don't call your API "simple"

From: Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:25:39 -0700
Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0598E087-19B9-4325-93FD-983260D27AAF@oracle.com>
To: Simon Raboczi <raboczi@gmail.com>
Art already asked this question a few weeks back [1]. Here is why we  
settled with the name SimpleDB (it is more than a placeholder) [2]:

It is simpler than SQL, which is the current basis for WebDatabase [3].


[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/0813A315-8FD6-4396-8E92-A24446390FBD@oracle.com
[2] http://www.w3.org/mid/27EB8B2E-6198-4032-98A8-0EE5191FC0C1@oracle.com
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/webdatabase/

On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Simon Raboczi wrote:

> Please don't call your web database API "simple".  It's a  
> meaningless noise word unless there's some other non-simple web  
> database API to compare it to.  It doesn't even serve to produce a  
> pronounceable acronym like SAX or SOAP.  "WebDB API" would be fine.
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 00:28:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:19 UTC