W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widget] relax NG schema

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:19:56 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670909011019t7b39bf9ex331963082068087e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2009, at 13:44 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>> It would be straightforward to have a P+C module with a group for the
>>> choice of its children, and then for instance WARP could just add
>>> <access> to that content.
>> Nah. I don't like it! Not only does it require a rocket-science degree,
>> but it's still means that you need to look in X-number of places to collate
>> all the bits of the schema. Like the Internets, this should all be
>> centralized ;)
> Don't worry, I'll have your cake and eat it too.
>>> Furthermore, since the schema isn't normative anyway, I think it could
>>> just sit in CVS like a software project and be pointed to by the specs.
>>> No need to include it in the spec's body.
>> Yes. This I like. Simple and centralized:
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rng
> Good. Cool. So I've made a few changes:
>  - renamed it to .rnc since it's in RNC and not RNG
>  - modularised it as explained earlier — so you can be happy because it's
> centralised to a single directory, but it's not a centralised file
>  - removed the built-in extensibility and used NVDL instead, which is more
> appropriate and maintainable
>  - added support for WARP
>  - removed a bunch of bugs
>  - added a bunch of tests (examples from the spec) to make sure it's okay

Awesome! Thanks Robin!

Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 17:21:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:18 UTC