W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widgets] P&C UA does not deal with SVG icons

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:55:38 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670908300955y60596105i5c15c0af54694782@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Arthur Barstow<art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 8:55 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
>
>> On Aug 28, 2009, at 11:52 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Same thing, should be a UI product — there's nothing wrong with
>>>> having a bit
>>>> of that, so long as it's not too constraining.
>>>
>>> I agree. I don't have a issue with the assertions. I just don't think
>>> this UI product should be defined as part of the P&C spec. What spec
>>> would house the UI product?
>>
>> Why not? Of the P+C consumer UAs, some will expose a UI. When they do,
>> there are a few rules to follow. P+C is the spec that tells you what
>> an icon is and where to find it — it seems perfectly fine to me that
>> the attached UI requirements would be co-located.
>
> I agree the text Marcos originally cited [1] should not be a normative
> requirement for a P+C UA.
>
> One way to address this bug is to make the cited text non-normative.
>
> As implied by these related threads, it would probably make sense to
> consolidate these Widget runtime UA requirements in a document. Any
> volunteers?
>

I can edit this, but not until mid October.



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Sunday, 30 August 2009 16:56:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT