W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [widgets] More misplaced assertions

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:33:16 -0400
Message-Id: <42159496-D25D-44BA-8CB1-386F7E437BF2@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:50 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com>  
> wrote:
>> On Aug 27, 2009, at 17:11 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't think the following two assertions are worth testing (and  
>>> should
>>> not apply to the P&C UA).
>>>
>>> [[
>>> A user agent should expose custom icons in a way that it is  
>>> visible to the
>>> end user.
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> And...
>>>
>>> [[
>>> When the license element's href attribute is used, the user agent  
>>> should
>>> provide end users the ability to view or otherwise link to the  
>>> referenced
>>> license.
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> I don't know if we should delete them, or move them to another spec.
>>
>> Both of those are UI-level conformance criteria. Maybe there  
>> should just be
>> a UI product?
>
> Yeah, that's what I'm thinking too.

I agree those two assertions should not apply to a strict P+C UA.

Creating a new conformance criteria for these requirements on a  
Widget runtime UA is one way to address these bugs.

-Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 13:34:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT