On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Robin Berjon<robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Aug 27, 2009, at 17:33 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >> I also don't believe that the following text belongs in the P&C spec >> (though it certainly needs to go somewhere): >> [[ >> A user agent that supports [SVG] as an icon format may display declarative >> animation. However, for security reasons, ... ]] >> >> WDYT? > > Same thing, should be a UI product — there's nothing wrong with having a bit > of that, so long as it's not too constraining. I agree. I don't have a issue with the assertions. I just don't think this UI product should be defined as part of the P&C spec. What spec would house the UI product? -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.auReceived on Friday, 28 August 2009 09:53:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:33 GMT