W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:08:07 +0100
Message-ID: <49C38727.1050404@opera.com>
To: SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS <benoit.suzanne@orange-ftgroup.com>
CC: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>, Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com, Mark.Priestley@vodafone.com, public-webapps@w3.org

Hi Benoit,
On 3/20/09 12:48 PM, SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS wrote:
> I believe that when creating content, it is easier/clearer to have multiple
> files. There is less confusion and therfore less errors.

sure... but,

>> Advantages here are:
>>    *  we only need to make very small modifications to the parsing model.
>>    *  no more searching for config docs in locale folders
>>    *  no multiple parsing of config files
>> Disadvantages:
>>   * large, and, if not careful, hard to maintain config files

For me, I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages here.

Kind regards,
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 12:09:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:14 UTC