W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:18:57 +0200
Message-ID: <26b395e60903211218u6b15c059q275aad4836deb7ac@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-webapps@w3.org

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
> Alright, lets see a show of hands for this approach! Who supports us
> just having a single config.xml with a bunch of repeated elements, but
> with different xml:langs?

opposed

Received on Saturday, 21 March 2009 19:19:38 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Channy Yun: "Web Sigining in Action"
Previous message: Giovanni Campagna: "Re: [CORS] Charset in content type"
In reply to: Marcos Caceres: "Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory"
Next in thread: Arthur Barstow: "Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT