W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [widgets] <option>s on <feature>s

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:51:11 +0100
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <823446DE-21CC-4DD5-8BD4-CCD9BA1CCFA4@berjon.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
On Mar 18, 2009, at 16:35 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> On 3/18/09 4:19 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Do you have some examples that involve things that aren't pants?
> <feature name="http://example.org/geo">
>  <option name="start-lat" value="51 6' N"/>
>  <option name="start-long" value="114 1' W"/>
> </feature>

You and Arve seem to have different understandings of what this is  
for, his example indicates that he's interested in specifying sub- 
features of a feature, yours seems to point at default values or some  
form of configuration for a feature.

But more in the following email about why I think this is a bad idea.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
     Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 21:51:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:14 UTC