W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:40:41 -0400
Message-Id: <4E00C1CD-0BC1-4C99-A800-449BF74989A2@nokia.com>
Cc: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, ext Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>, "Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere)" <Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
Marcos,

On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:42 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Frederick Hirsch
> <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I made this change since we decided this week to have case  
>> sensitivity.
>> Too bad we have to use literals in hex for this case ...
>
> Hmmm... is it bad that in the P&C spec we just say "case sensitive"
> and not give the hex to match the file names? we do this for default
> start file types, e.g. "index.html"

I generally agree it would be good to have some consistency between  
the P&C and DigSig specs. However, I think we also want the P&C spec  
to be accessible (here the context is more about readability) for  
widget authors.

-Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 11:42:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT