W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Widget Signature update

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:51:18 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <87899002-F322-4A54-BD3C-C42A01E7C215@nokia.com>
To: ext Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
I updated section 4 to correspond to  this:

"If the signatures list is not empty, sort the list of signatures by  
the file name field in ascending numerical order (e.g.signature1.xml  
followed by signature2.xml followed by signature3.xml etc)."


regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:07 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

> Hi Frederick,
>
> On 3/6/09 3:59 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>> I've updated the widget signature document distributor file naming
>> convention to the following after discussing this with Josh (thanks  
>> Josh):
>>
>> Naming convention for a distributor signature:
>>    |"signature" [1-9][0-9]* ".xml"|
>>
>>        *
>>
>>          Each distributor signature /MUST/ have a name consisting of
>>          the string "signature" followed by a digit in the range 1-9
>>          inclusive, followed by zero or more digits in the range 0-9
>>          inclusive and then ".xml", as stated by the BNF. An  
>> example is
>>          "signature20.xml".
>>
>>        *
>>
>>          Leading zeros are disallowed in the numbers.
>>
>>        *
>>
>>          Any file name that does not match this BNF /MUST/ be  
>> ignored.
>>          Thus a file named "signature01.xml" will be ignored. A  
>> warning
>>          /MAY/ be generated.
>>
>>        *
>>
>>          There is no requirement that all the signature file names  
>> form
>>          a contiguous set of numeric values.
>>
>>        *
>>
>>          These signatures /MUST/ be sorted numerically based on the
>>          numeric portion of the name. Thus signature2.xml preceeds
>>          signature11.xml, for example.
>>
>>
>> See draft
>> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#distributor-signatures
>>
>> I also updated the notation section, changed the code format to be
>> italic (without color), and updated the body style to not be quite  
>> so large.
>>
>> Please indicate any comment or corrections on the list.
>>
>
> The changes look good to me! thank you.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
Received on Monday, 9 March 2009 20:53:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT