W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: ISSUE-82 (Access element naming conflict): potential conflict between the XHTML <access> and Widget <access> element [Widgets]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:21:04 -0500
Message-Id: <D75C4692-98A1-4EAD-907A-EB432235F854@nokia.com>
To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
During the March 5 widgets voice conference, the group agreed [1]  
this issue can be closed since the packaging and configuration spec  
uses a namespace to address this issue [2].

-Regards, Art Barstow

[1] <http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html#item06>
[2] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#namespace>


On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:55 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue  
Tracker wrote:

>
> ISSUE-82 (Access element naming conflict): potential conflict  
> between the XHTML <access> and Widget <access> element [Widgets]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/82
>
> Raised by: Doug Schepers
> On product: Widgets
>
> In [4], Doug Schepers identified a potential conflict between the  
> <access> element defined in the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and  
> Configuration specification [1] and the <access> element defined in  
> the XHTML Access Module specification [2] (most recent draft also  
> available [3]).
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-access-element
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-access/#sec_3.1.
> [3] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-access-20081023/
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/ 
> 0507.html
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 17:22:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT