During the March 5 widgets voice conference, the group agreed [1] this issue can be closed since the packaging and configuration spec uses a namespace to address this issue [2]. -Regards, Art Barstow [1] <http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html#item06> [2] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#namespace> On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:55 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-82 (Access element naming conflict): potential conflict > between the XHTML <access> and Widget <access> element [Widgets] > > http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/82 > > Raised by: Doug Schepers > On product: Widgets > > In [4], Doug Schepers identified a potential conflict between the > <access> element defined in the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and > Configuration specification [1] and the <access> element defined in > the XHTML Access Module specification [2] (most recent draft also > available [3]). > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-access-element > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-access/#sec_3.1. > [3] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-xhtml-access-20081023/ > [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/ > 0507.htmlReceived on Thursday, 5 March 2009 17:22:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:07 GMT