W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: [widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:59:37 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3471BC64-468D-4E04-974E-45E60253D23C@nokia.com>
To: Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere) <Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com>
yes that has been the case ever since I've started working on this.

Perhaps there is a W3C standard stylesheet we should be using. I'm not  
sure why the spec defines its own styles

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Kapyaho Jere (Nokia-D-MSW/Tampere) wrote:

> Easier on the eye, but to me itís pretty close to the color of RFC  
> 2119 keyword style (em.ct).
>
> Seems like the body text font has grown in size somewhat, compared  
> to other specs.
>
> --Jere
>
> On 5.3.2009 18.03, "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com 
> > wrote:
>
> I updated the style for <code> items in the Digital Signature
> specification to brown.
>
> Does this work better? It does not conflict with other color uses as
> far as I can tell.
>
> Please look at
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/  (refresh)
>
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
> >
> >    JS: re styling, orange doesn't work well for me regarding
> >    readability
> >
> >    MC: I can help with that
> >
> >    FH: I'll take a pass at that
> >
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 17:00:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT