W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

[Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:00:43 +0100
To: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.up9h3hfdwxe0ny@widsith.local>
Hi folks,

as a result of the great work by many, it seems we have all the things in  
place to move the Selectors API specification directly to Proposed  
Recommendation. In order to do so, we need to demonstrate that we have  
implementations which prove the spec can be implemented in an  
interoperable way.

Thanks to great work by John Resig, informative analysis by Travis, and  
implementatio work by many, it seems this is the case. To clarify that,  
this is a call for consensus on the following question:

The test suite by John Resig, 2009-02-19 version[1] is a sufficiently  
complete test suite for the editor's draft version 1.97[2] of "Selectors  
API"

[1]  
http://github.com/jeresig/selectortest/blob/4827dedddaea6fa0b70cfdaadeeafef0d732a753/index.html
[2]  
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?rev=1.97&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1

Note that while silence will be taken as assent, this question will not be  
held to have carried without significant explicit agreement. Nor will it  
be held to have carried if there is any dissent.

Please provide responses in this thread on the public mailing list before  
the end of Sunday, 15 March.

Cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 10:01:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:30 GMT