W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Required support for SVG in widgets

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:52:55 +0000
Message-ID: <b21a10670902051152p6abfd109pb4c539383c46ab38@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Cc: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>
>> Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi
>> specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are
>> ready. If the specs are done, implemented, and have an associated
>> test-suite, then standardization through the W3C should be a breeze,
>> right?
>
> The W3C doesn't do rubber-stamping. If OMTP wants to have their specs be
> Recs they will need to have them go through the process, and that means that
> changes to them are possible. Given that, if they really want W3C to
> integrate their APIs they should submit earlier than when they're ready.

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply any rubber-stamping on the part of the
W3C. In fact, I was being little sarcastic :) Anyway, we are getting
off topic.

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 19:53:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:29 GMT