- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 19:52:55 +0000
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Jon Ferraiolo <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >> >> Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi >> specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are >> ready. If the specs are done, implemented, and have an associated >> test-suite, then standardization through the W3C should be a breeze, >> right? > > The W3C doesn't do rubber-stamping. If OMTP wants to have their specs be > Recs they will need to have them go through the process, and that means that > changes to them are possible. Given that, if they really want W3C to > integrate their APIs they should submit earlier than when they're ready. Sorry, I didn't mean to imply any rubber-stamping on the part of the W3C. In fact, I was being little sarcastic :) Anyway, we are getting off topic. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 19:53:39 UTC