W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Points of order on this WG

From: Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:18:39 -0700
Cc: arun@mozilla.com, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Jeff Mischkinsky <JEFF.MISCHKINSKY@oracle.com>
Message-Id: <D9B5DC15-BBB6-4D31-B7E6-27DE13F30CB1@oracle.com>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
I have listed these requirements on my blog - http://o-micron.blogspot.com/2009/06/requirements-for-and-components-needed.html

I will put these together in a forma suitable for W3C uses.

Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com



On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:13 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:

> Hi, Arun-
>
> Arun Ranganathan wrote (on 6/25/09 1:38 AM):
>>
>>>> On Jun 23, 2009, at 5:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>>> The Web Storage specification is someone dead-locked right now due
>>>>> to the  lack of consensus on whether to use SQL or not.
>>
>> This topic continues to be discussed in Mozilla newsgroups. Few are
>> reconciled to SQL usage:
>>
>> Example:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.community.web-standards/topics
>>
>> Solutions such as BrowserCouch (which straddles localStorage  
>> currently)
>> offer other options: http://www.toolness.com/wp/?p=580
>>
>> I'd personally rather see a clear articulation of use cases that we
>> agree are important for the web than further specification work.
>
> Actually, I think that's an excellent point.  Nikunj, maybe that is  
> the next logical step?  Could you take charge of that?
>
> Regards-
> -Doug Schepers
> W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 18:21:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT