- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:23:50 +0300
- To: marcosc@opera.com
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Arve Bersvendsen <arveb@opera.com>
On Jun 16, 2009, at 15:42, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Based on Arve and Robin's additional feedback, I've added the > following to the spec as part of "The Feature Element" section: > > "How a user agent makes use of features depends on the user agent's > security policy, hence activation and authorization requirements for > features are beyond the scope of this specification." > > Is that satisfactory? I think it's better than what was in the spec before. However, if a reader doesn't already know what <feature> is for, I think the current text might not make it quite clear. I notice that now the definition of what a feature is includes a video codec in addition to APIs. Does BONDI expect video codecs to be sensitive to security policies? Do you envision undeclared video codecs to be withheld from the HTML5 <source> fallback and canPlayType()? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 13:24:31 UTC