W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:07:58 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906090707t3efd9042l33e8ef5cc299294f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>>>Right. However, I don't know why we are discussing this if, as you
>>>said before, it has no relevance to widgets.
> Last week during the BONDI meeting that you also attended we concluded that requestFeature() will be applicable also to widgets. The detailed discussion is planned anyway.

BONDI is not WebApps. What BONDI decides to do has no bearing here
until it is formally proposed as an input.

Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 14:09:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:36:35 UTC