W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:07:58 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906090707t3efd9042l33e8ef5cc299294f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Marcin
Hanclik<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
>>>Right. However, I don't know why we are discussing this if, as you
>>>said before, it has no relevance to widgets.
> Last week during the BONDI meeting that you also attended we concluded that requestFeature() will be applicable also to widgets. The detailed discussion is planned anyway.
>

BONDI is not WebApps. What BONDI decides to do has no bearing here
until it is formally proposed as an input.

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 14:09:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT