W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, 3

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:47:29 +0200
Message-ID: <b21a10670906020947w2735357el1e245d9c4a7d2ad7@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Marcin Hanclik
<Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> Thanks for the fixes.
>
>>>> Version attribute
>>>> "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary string (possibly empty) that denotes a software version
>>>identifier."
>>>> What is software?
>>>> 8.5 says
>>>> version
>>>>    A version attribute that specifies the version of the widget. It is optional for authors to use this attribute.
>>>> Both shall be aligned.
>>>
>>>Right, the first definition is intended to be generic and abstract so
>>>it can be re-applied in the future if needed.
>
> So what about the consistency and our versioning discussion?
> You already know that you want to re-apply a definition.
> I think a consistent definition, at least within one document would help in comprehending the topic.

I've just made it:  "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary
string (possibly empty)." That's all it is.



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 16:48:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:31 GMT