- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:47:29 +0200
- To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > Thanks for the fixes. > >>>> Version attribute >>>> "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary string (possibly empty) that denotes a software version >>>identifier." >>>> What is software? >>>> 8.5 says >>>> version >>>> A version attribute that specifies the version of the widget. It is optional for authors to use this attribute. >>>> Both shall be aligned. >>> >>>Right, the first definition is intended to be generic and abstract so >>>it can be re-applied in the future if needed. > > So what about the consistency and our versioning discussion? > You already know that you want to re-apply a definition. > I think a consistent definition, at least within one document would help in comprehending the topic. I've just made it: "The value of a version attribute is an arbitrary string (possibly empty)." That's all it is. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 16:48:33 UTC