Re: [widget] Security model

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote:
> I should have made myself more clear. I meant that the widget would behave
> as if it had been dragged from the hard-drive with respect to access to HTTP
> resources via inline content. The model I am proposing is dependent on the
> widget:// URI scheme and the assumption that widget:// acts a mounted drive
> for the widget. Access to the file system would be forbidden. No way was I
> intending to imply otherwise.

It might be more productive to spec what you actually mean instead of
using an analogy to a part of the browser security model with poor
interoperability.

Adam