Gavin Kistner wrote: > I find these names rather cumbersome and not very self-explanatory. I agree. > Though it may be far too late for this suggestion, I would suggest that > they should be something such as: > > findNode()/findNodes() or findNode()/findAllNodes() > selectNode()/selectNodes() or selectNode()/selectAllNodes() > findBySelector()/findAllBySelector() However, unfortunately, given the significant amount of prior discussion of this issue and the formal process which led to the selection of the current names; and the fact that we have implementations due to be released in upcoming versions of each of the 4 major browsers, changing the name at this stage is not possible. Please let me know whether or not you are satisfied with this response. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 15:51:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:01 GMT