W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:01:43 +0200
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ujhc85bf64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about  
> having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the  
> appropriate abort/error/load event.
> However I'm not sure why that way is better? I.e. why would you want to  
> prevent abort/error/load from firing?
> I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the  
> first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very  
> intuitive.

I agree that dispatching loadend last makes sense.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 14:02:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:12 UTC