Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about  
> having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the  
> appropriate abort/error/load event.
>
> However I'm not sure why that way is better? I.e. why would you want to  
> prevent abort/error/load from firing?
>
> I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the  
> first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very  
> intuitive.

I agree that dispatching loadend last makes sense.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>