W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0200
Message-ID: <49007E65.9030200@sicking.cc>
To: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>

Garrett Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
>> <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
>>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24
>>>
>>> Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please have a look through
>> It was agreed that loadend should fire prior to abort | error | load.

I do remember that we talked about it that way, and also talked about 
having the default action of the loadend event be to fire the 
appropriate abort/error/load event.

However I'm not sure why that way is better? I.e. why would you want to 
prevent abort/error/load from firing?

I do like the symmetry in the current proposal where loadstart is the 
first thing that fires, and loadend is the last thing. Seems very intuitive.

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 13:40:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:28 GMT