Hi Marcos, On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosscaceres@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > I've dropped the etag attribute from the <update> element in the > Widget Packaging spec as I deemed it too difficult to use in practice How so? > (and mostly redundant). It is also unnecessary as updates will be > handled through Update Description Documents as defined in the Updates > spec (and not by pointing to widget packages on the Web). I will try > to have the Update spec ready for FPWD by the end of today. That seems a tad overengineered to me. Have implementors bought into it? It seems to me that the etag solution is the low hanging fruit here. Mark.Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 14:20:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:00 GMT