Kris Zyp wrote: >>>> Well, at least when an outgoing XmlHttpRequest goes with a body, the >>>> spec could require that upon setting the Content-Encoding header to >>>> "gzip" or "deflate", that the body be adequately transformed. Or is >>>> there another e.g. to POST a gzip request with Content-Encoding? >>> >>> Why can it not just be added transparently by the XHR implementation? >> >> I doubt that it could. An UA implementation won't know which encodings >> the server supports. >> >> I suspect compression from the UA to the server will need support on >> the XHR object in order to work. I don't think the right way to do it >> is through setRequestHeader though, that seems like a hack at best. > > I would have thought this would be negotiated by the server sending a > Accept-Encoding header to indicate what forms of encoding it could > handle for request entities. XHR requests are almost always proceeded by > a separate response from a server (the web page) that can indicate the > server's ability to decode request entities. I think that this would go against the spirit of HTTP. The idea of HTTP is that it is state-less, so you should not carry state from one request to the next. / JonasReceived on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 23:02:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:00 GMT