W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite

From: Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:06:55 -0700
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>
CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <083D18C6B9B71F4CBCA7B76D97B748310C80CAC381@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Then I definitely would recommend an Exception.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 7:05 PM
> To: Zhenbin Xu
> Cc: Jonas Sicking; Sunava Dutta; public-webapps@w3.org; IE8 Core AJAX
> SWAT Team
> Subject: RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was:
> Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC
> Test Suite
>
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Zhenbin Xu wrote:
> >
> > I once again propose the spec simply state "null or exception" with
> > sufficient explanations.
>
> I don't really mind if it is null or an exception, but simply allowing
> both isn't going to get us interoperability, so I'm against that. The
> whole point of a spec is to avoid cases where different browsers do
> different things like this.
>
> --
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.
> fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._
> ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-
> .;.'
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 02:07:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:26 GMT