W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2008

RE: <New: Tracking Issues in XHR that we raised>RE: <Was: Further LC Followup from IE> RE: Potential bugs identified in XHR LC Test Suite

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:04:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: Zhenbin Xu <Zhenbin.Xu@microsoft.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Sunava Dutta <sunavad@windows.microsoft.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>, IE8 Core AJAX SWAT Team <ieajax@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0806200201260.13974@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, Zhenbin Xu wrote:
> 
> I once again propose the spec simply state "null or exception" with 
> sufficient explanations.

I don't really mind if it is null or an exception, but simply allowing 
both isn't going to get us interoperability, so I'm against that. The 
whole point of a spec is to avoid cases where different browsers do 
different things like this.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 02:05:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:26 GMT