W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > April 2014

Re: [testing] Proposal: close public-webapps-testsuite

From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:49:24 -0700
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Message-id: <94CC5889-86DA-497A-99F7-8A52B671E5C2@apple.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Sounds like a great plan to me. I'm not sure automatically forwarding emails to public-webapps is a great fallback.  It might be spammy for us.  I think an auto-reply with references to testing infra. mailing list would be better.

- R. Niwa

> On Apr 2, 2014, at 5:39 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> 
> [ Bcc: public-test-infra; Advanced apologies for the cross-posting ]
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> WebApps created the [public-webapps-testsuite] (p-w-ts) list when the group's testing effort was centralized in hg/webapps/. Since then, the group adopted Github and [w-p-t] for its testing and all relevant discussions about testing infrastructure are conducted on [public-test-infra] (p-t-i) and in [#testing].
> 
> Although p-w-ts used to have a low to moderate level of e-mail, the list has effectively become obsoleted by the GH workflow and notifications about important changes in the infrastructure that are relevant to WebApps are not sent to p-w-ts. Consequently, I propose:
> 
> 1. public-webapps-testsuite be closed (the archive will of course remain)
> 
> 2. All e-mail sent to p-w-ts will automatically be forwarded to public-webapps. Another option is to automatically reply to the sender and tell them: p-w-ts is closed and to re-send their e-mail to public-webapps.
> 
> 3. In the event there is a need to discuss one of WebApps' test suites, use the public-webapps list.
> 
> Any comments or objections to the above?
> 
> I support #1 and am indifferent about the options in #2 although W3C's SysTeam recommends the later option which seems fine by me.
> 
> BTW, of the ~50 people subscribed to p-w-ts, almost half of them are also subscribed to p-t-i. Regardless of whether or not this proposal passes, if you want to follow W3C's testing effort I strongly recommend you subscribe to p-t-i.
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> [public-webapps-testsuite] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/>
> [public-test-infra] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/>
> [w-p-t] <https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests>
> [#testing] <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/testing/>
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:    ACTION-713: If systeam can autoforward p-w-testsuite to p-test-infra, close p-w-ts (Web Applications Working Group)
> Date:    Tue, 1 Apr 2014 14:33:36 +0000
> From:    ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
> Reply-To:    Web Applications Working Group <public-webapps@w3.org>
> To:    <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> 
> 
> 
> ACTION-713: If systeam can autoforward p-w-testsuite to p-test-infra, close p-w-ts (Web Applications Working Group)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/713
> 
> On: Arthur Barstow
> Due: 2014-04-08
> 
> If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group, please update your settings at:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/users/7672#settings
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 7 April 2014 22:49:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:57:41 UTC