W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > February 2013

RE: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28

From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:00 +0900
To: 'Arthur Barstow' <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "'Ms2ger @ Mozilla'" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org, cpgs@samsung.com
Message-id: <04a001ce102d$12394940$36abdbc0$@samsung.com>
Hi Ms2ger,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:59 PM
> 
> On 2/21/13 1:13 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:40 AM
> >>
> > Thank you so much. I think test case #1 and #6 in constructor.html
> > should be moved to DOM spec test. It is resorting to the
> > implementation of Event interface. E.g., WebKit Event implementation
> > does not even have isTrusted attribute at the moment.
> 
> Please copy interface.html to the approved directory <http://w3c-
> test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/approved/>.
> 
> If no one objects to removing #1 and #6 from constructor.html before Feb
> 24 then please put a version of that file in the approved and only include
> the other tests.
> 

Checking again, IMO, only the following three assertions should be retained
in #1:
  assert_equals(ev.lengthComputable, false)
  assert_equals(ev.loaded, 0)
  assert_equals(ev.total, 0)
and #6 should be moved to DOM.

Would you review it again?


> After the approved file are in place, one then needs to update
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/Status.html> and
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents>.
> 
> -Thanks, Art
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 12:15:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 April 2014 14:15:59 UTC