- From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:00 +0900
- To: 'Arthur Barstow' <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "'Ms2ger @ Mozilla'" <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org, cpgs@samsung.com
Hi Ms2ger, > -----Original Message----- > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:59 PM > > On 2/21/13 1:13 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:40 AM > >> > > Thank you so much. I think test case #1 and #6 in constructor.html > > should be moved to DOM spec test. It is resorting to the > > implementation of Event interface. E.g., WebKit Event implementation > > does not even have isTrusted attribute at the moment. > > Please copy interface.html to the approved directory <http://w3c- > test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/approved/>. > > If no one objects to removing #1 and #6 from constructor.html before Feb > 24 then please put a version of that file in the approved and only include > the other tests. > Checking again, IMO, only the following three assertions should be retained in #1: assert_equals(ev.lengthComputable, false) assert_equals(ev.loaded, 0) assert_equals(ev.total, 0) and #6 should be moved to DOM. Would you review it again? > After the approved file are in place, one then needs to update > <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/Status.html> and > <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents>. > > -Thanks, Art
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 12:15:39 UTC