W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > February 2013

Re: RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:59:14 -0500
Message-ID: <51260C12.1040204@nokia.com>
To: ext Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
CC: "'Ms2ger @ Mozilla'" <ms2ger@gmail.com>, public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org, cpgs@samsung.com
On 2/21/13 1:13 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 3:40 AM
>> Jungkee - it appears there is quite a bit of implementation work needed
>> before this spec can exit CR. Do you have any data regarding a timeline
>> for when the implementations will be updated to conform to the CR?
> I think the timeline would be depending on the browser vendors and WebKit
> community. Anyway, I'll filing the bugs soon and share the status keeping my
> eyes on the feedbacks.

Sounds good; thanks.

>> FYI, I created the document
>> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents> to summarize the
>> status of the tests based on this thread. (A few followups below.)
> Thank you so much. I think test case #1 and #6 in constructor.html should be
> moved to DOM spec test. It is resorting to the implementation of Event
> interface. E.g., WebKit Event implementation does not even have isTrusted
> attribute at the moment.

Please copy interface.html to the approved directory 

If no one objects to removing #1 and #6 from constructor.html before Feb 
24 then please put a version of that file in the approved and only 
include the other tests.

After the approved file are in place, one then needs to update 
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/Status.html> and 

-Thanks, Art
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 11:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:57:40 UTC