Subject: Archive Resend: January 27 RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission

Re-sending for archival purposes...

-----Original Message-----
From: 유성옥 
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:14 PM
To: 'Arthur Barstow'; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
Cc: 이종흔; 김성택
Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

Hi. All
We've checked all features with Web Storage. 
Please let me know if you have comments or we have something missing. 


Best Regards
Sung-Ok. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:45 PM
To: 유성옥; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
Cc: 이종흔; 김성택
Subject: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

Thanks Sung-Ok.

Sugn-OK, All - is Infraware's submission sufficiently complete such that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web Storage Candidate Recommendation [CR]? If not, what features are not tested?

-AB

[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/#crec


On 1/17/12 1:48 AM, ext 유성옥 wrote:
> Hi. All
>
> I've updated the test case with the latest spec.
> I also uploaded a test for "Content Editable".
> If you have any comment about it, feel free let me know.
>
> Best Regards
> Sung-Ok, You
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 유성옥
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:34 AM
> To: 'Kris Krueger'; Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger
> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org; 이종흔; 김성택
> Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission 
> [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]
>
> Hi, all 
> This is Sung-Ok You from Infraware.
> We referred to WR version when we submitted  the test case.( 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110208/ ) We're working on 
> updating it  with new version of 
> spec.(http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/  ) I'll update 
> new test case in 2 weeks. (We'll use testharness.js :))
>
> Best Regards,
> Sung-Ok You(Infraware)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Krueger [mailto:krisk@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:54 AM
> To: Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; 김성택; 권우일
> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission 
> [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]
>
> Yes they do use testharness.js
>
> -Kris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 5:03 AM
> To: ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; Sung Taeg Kim; Woo il Kwon
> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
> Subject: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission 
> [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]
>
> Thanks Ms2ger!
>
> Infraware people - what is the status of Infraware's Web Storage test suite submission? Do all of those tests use testharness.js?
>
> Do you consider your submission sufficiently complete such that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web Storage Candidate Recommendation? If not, what features are not tested?
>
> -Thanks, Art
>
> On 12/27/11 6:18 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Back in July I noted a submission of test cases from Infraware. [1] 
>> I've now pushed the tests for appcache to the HTML test repository, 
>> [2] and those for Web Storage to WebApps'. [3]
>>
>> Ms2ger
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Jul/001

>> 2 .html [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/d82d1d0fb1de

>> [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/5fa98635b761

>>
>

Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 01:13:31 UTC