W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org > March 2012

Subject: Archive Resend: January 30 RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission

From: 유성옥 <sungok.you@infraware.co.kr>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:14:37 +0900
Message-ID: <932C9F349DF6A64385F50954E1964FEA040E8660@TOMAS.infraware.co.kr>
To: <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>, 이종흔 <jhlee@infraware.co.kr>, 김성택 <stkim@infraware.co.kr>
Re-sending for archival purposes...

 

From: 유성옥 
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 10:15 AM
To: 'art.barstow@nokia.com'
Cc: 'public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org'; 이종흔; 김성택
Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

 

Hi AB! 

Thank you for updating my submission. 

As you know, some features in Web Storage are excluded with the latest spec. However the test cases remain in the storage. 

<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/ <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/> > 

To make it clear, please remove the test cases for excluded features. 

Please check the items to remove. 

 

 

 

 

Best Regards,

Sung Ok, You. 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 11:09 PM
To: 유성옥; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org
Cc: 이종흔; 김성택
Subject: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

 

Ok, thanks Sung-OK.

 

All - has anyone besides the folks at Infraware reviewed their submission <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/ <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebStorage/tests/submissions/Infraware/> > re whether or not it is sufficient to evaluate an implementation of the Web Storage CR? If yes, please provide your comments.

 

In the absence of any immediate negative feedback, next week I will plan to start a RfR for this submission.

 

-AB

 

On 1/27/12 12:14 AM, ext 유성옥 wrote:

> Hi. All

> We've checked all features with Web Storage.

> Please let me know if you have comments or we have something missing.

> 

> 

> Best Regards

> Sung-Ok.

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] <mailto:[mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]> 

> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 10:45 PM

> To: 유성옥; public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <mailto:public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> 

> Cc: 이종흔; 김성택

> Subject: Re: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission 

> [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

> 

> Thanks Sung-Ok.

> 

> Sugn-OK, All - is Infraware's submission sufficiently complete such 

> that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web 

> Storage Candidate Recommendation [CR]? If not, what features are not tested?

> 

> -AB

> 

> [CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/#crec <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/#crec> 

> 

> On 1/17/12 1:48 AM, ext 유성옥 wrote:

>> Hi. All

>> 

>> I've updated the test case with the latest spec.

>> I also uploaded a test for "Content Editable".

>> If you have any comment about it, feel free let me know.

>> 

>> Best Regards

>> Sung-Ok, You

>> 

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: 유성옥

>> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:34 AM

>> To: 'Kris Krueger'; Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger

>> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <mailto:public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> ; 이종흔; 김성택

>> Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test 

>> submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

>> 

>> Hi, all   

>> This is Sung-Ok You from Infraware.

>> We referred to WR version when we submitted  the test case.( 

>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110208/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110208/>  ) We're working on 

>> updating it  with new version of 

>> spec.(http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/ <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-webstorage-20111208/>   ) I'll 

>> update new test case in 2 weeks. (We'll use testharness.js :))

>> 

>> Best Regards,

>> Sung-Ok You(Infraware)

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Kris Krueger [mailto:krisk@microsoft.com] <mailto:[mailto:krisk@microsoft.com]> 

>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:54 AM

>> To: Arthur Barstow; ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; 김성택; 권우일

>> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <mailto:public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> 

>> Subject: RE: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test 

>> submission [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

>> 

>> Yes they do use testharness.js

>> 

>> -Kris

>> 

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com] <mailto:[mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]> 

>> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 5:03 AM

>> To: ext Ms2ger; 유성옥; 이종흔; Sung Taeg Kim; Woo il Kwon

>> Cc: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <mailto:public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> 

>> Subject: Seeking status of Infraware's Web Storage test submission 

>> [Was: Re: Infraware test submissions]

>> 

>> Thanks Ms2ger!

>> 

>> Infraware people - what is the status of Infraware's Web Storage test suite submission? Do all of those tests use testharness.js?

>> 

>> Do you consider your submission sufficiently complete such that it can be used to evaluate an implementation vis-a-vis the Web Storage Candidate Recommendation? If not, what features are not tested?

>> 

>> -Thanks, Art

>> 

>> On 12/27/11 6:18 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote:

>>> Hi all,

>>> 

>>> Back in July I noted a submission of test cases from Infraware. [1] 

>>> I've now pushed the tests for appcache to the HTML test repository, 

>>> [2] and those for Web Storage to WebApps'. [3]

>>> 

>>> Ms2ger

>>> 

>>> [1]

>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Jul/00 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Jul/00> 

>>> 12 .html [2] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/d82d1d0fb1de <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/d82d1d0fb1de> 

>>> [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/5fa98635b761 <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/rev/5fa98635b761> 

>>> 



image001.png
(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Friday, 9 March 2012 01:14:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 March 2012 01:14:40 GMT