Re: [heycam/webidl] Should `includes` be allowed as operation names? (#767) from Boris Zbarsky on 2019-08-12 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from August 2019)

From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2019 18:32:22 -0700
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/767/520279312@github.com>

We should generally not make backwards-incompatible changes unless we're forced to.  So yes. ideally we would keep allowing "includes" as an identifier-like thing in all the cases that are unambiguous.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/767#issuecomment-520279312

Received on Monday, 12 August 2019 01:32:44 UTC