Re: [heycam/webidl] Should `includes` be allowed as operation names? (#767)

It'd let me remove a note from the spec explaining that `_includes` is just the IDL, not the actual method name. So 👍 as a spec author, not sure how much work updating the blink implementation would be.

Would want WPT and Bikeshed updates too.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/767#issuecomment-520566779

Received on Monday, 12 August 2019 19:42:19 UTC