Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] SharedWorker script interception after redirects (#1289)

Yea, doing something seems reasonable.  It is really weird that a no-fetch service worker for scope1 in this case ends up controlling a script served over the network from scope2.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1289#issuecomment-374714782

Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2018 18:51:06 UTC