Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] SharedWorker script interception after redirects (#1289)

I'm happy to take a look at what the best fix for the specification would be, unless someone wants to volunteer, but I'd like to wait until tests are written and it's clear implementers will follow through.

We already have a number of weird interop issues with workers and Fetch also has a number of outstanding PRs waiting on implementers to take action, so I'd rather not add to that if there's still uncertainty.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1289#issuecomment-374864840