Re: [whatwg/url] It's not immediately clear that "URL syntax" and "URL parser" conflict (#118)

There's no processing requirements for plain text in that RFC. E.g., for http://example.com. there's nothing there that states whether the trailing dot is part of the URL or not. I guess you could assume that the RFC states it should be included, but almost no tool would want that kind of behavior so they'd all violate the RFC.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-338207850