Re: [whatwg/url] It's not immediately clear that "URL syntax" and "URL parser" conflict (#118)

This issue complains that the WHATWG pushes a URL definition that only represents a tiny amount of stakeholders as canonical.

No adoption has happened, even by the stakeholders taking part in the issue, since.

As result, maybe the WHATWG should reopen this, and re-evaluate if promoting this definition as the canonical definition of "URL" is a good idea, or if this standard should be dropped.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-337844034

Received on Thursday, 19 October 2017 08:56:43 UTC