Re: [whatwg/url] It's not immediately clear that "URL syntax" and "URL parser" conflict (#118)

> No, it is not. http://example.org/foo bar -> http://example.org/foo%20bar is the opposite of a compression opportunity.

Yup, fair point.

So let's call this what it is: URL normalisation. This spec proposes a wide range of possible forms of URLs that must parse, but defines a canonical URL form. I think @bagder and I are suggesting that perhaps defining both of these things is not a good idea.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-276319688