Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should the fragment identifier be stripped from the scriptURL? (#1249)

Are the hash fragments not stored as part of the request URL?

And would the fragment even make it to the service worker since that part of the URL would not be sent to the server? They are really to drive client-side behavior and not network/server behavior.
If a fragment was used it is retained in the client-side to drive the desired behavior, but would not initiate a network request, assuming the base url did not change.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1249#issuecomment-353049468

Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2017 12:23:08 UTC