- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 December 2017 17:52:19 UTC
> It would seem okayish to me if it was not bypassing the cache. What is the reason to bypass it? I expect setting `updateViaCache` to default to `all` would be the least breaking way to address this if you want to deviate from the spec. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1250#issuecomment-352503575
Received on Monday, 18 December 2017 17:52:19 UTC