Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider syntactic changes to WebIDL to make it more "JavaScript-y" (#485)

Some prior work at https://github.com/w3ctag/jsidl and I thought there were other similar proposals around but can't locate them right now.

> Use getter/setter method syntax instead of attribute

There is no getter/setter method syntax that allows just _declaring_ the method without specifying its body.  Furthermore, the getter/setter method syntax obviously doesn't include the type annotations WebIDL has.  So presumably this just means some syntax similar to the getter/setter syntax, but details TBD?



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/485#issuecomment-349373753

Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2017 17:14:30 UTC