Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a simple synchronous k-v storage for ServiceWorker? (#981)

I also agree that IDB is too complicated for simple k-v storage. I think that an asyn k-v storage would be the best solution here.  It is something in between IDB and localstorage

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/981#issuecomment-249364876