Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a simple synchronous k-v storage for ServiceWorker? (#981)

Because physical IO may block script? Or for synchronization between callers? If the later, I guess the storage can be made only accessible from the current Service Worker?

IDB sounds too heavy for many cases, but it may make sense to expose that in SW... I still hope there could be a simple kv storage like Web Storage API.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/981#issuecomment-249363734